Busywork Log

What's actually worth your team's time, checked every few days.

Latest entries

Newest first
Oct152026Oct 15, 2026
Hype check ChatGPT's new interactive answers Does ChatGPT's Intelligent UI change anything for a small team? $0 extraon any ChatGPT plan, Free included

OpenAI shipped GPT-6 last week along with a new way for ChatGPT to lay out its answers, and I wanted to see what it looks like once you get past the demo clips.

What it is

Intelligent UI is a new answer format in ChatGPT that arrived with GPT-6 on October 7. When it decides a question calls for it, ChatGPT builds a chart or a small working calculator inside the reply. Paid plans run it on GPT-6 Sol, and Free and Go users got it a day later on GPT-6 Luna.

The claim

OpenAI pitches it as answers you can use instead of read, with examples like a bill splitter or a road trip map with stops. It also says GPT-6 starts answering search-heavy questions about 44% sooner than the model before it.

What it actually does

It's included in every ChatGPT plan at no extra cost, from Free up to a Business seat at $20 a month billed annually, so there's nothing to buy. OpenAI's own announcement admits the design judgment still needs work, and its speed figures come from internal testing. I couldn't find an independent hands-on test yet, and the models behind the Work tab and Codex didn't change in this release.

Who it fits

If your team already uses ChatGPT you'll get it automatically, and it's handy for a quick comparison or a rough estimate you want to adjust. Nobody should switch tools or upgrade a plan for it, and a calculator it builds shouldn't go in front of a client until someone checks the math.

Mostly hype.

Use it when it shows up, but don't plan anything around it. It mostly changes how answers look, and the parts of ChatGPT a team would lean on for real work are the same as before.

Oct152026Oct 15, 2026
Internal team Explaining the same process to every new hire Does a 20-person team need a documentation tool to stop re-explaining the same process? ~25-30 hrsper year, team of 20

I wanted to know whether writing down a process for new hires really needs its own software, so I spent some time on it this week.

The task

Every time someone new starts, a senior person sits down and walks them through how expenses or client handoffs work, the same way they did for the last hire.

The real cost

For a 20-person team hiring five or six people a year, figure roughly 4 to 6 hours of a senior person's time per hire just walking through the same handful of processes. That adds up to something like 25 to 30 hours a year, mostly from the people you can least spare.

The fix

Tools like Scribe will turn a click-through into a step-by-step guide, but the team plan is $13 a seat with a five-seat minimum, so about $65 a month before anyone writes a word. The free version works fine: the next time someone explains a process, they write it down as they go or record a short screen walkthrough (Loom's free plan allows 25 videos of up to 5 minutes each), and each new hire fixes whatever was out of date before the next one starts.

Oct132026Oct 13, 2026
Hype check ChatGPT dots, two weeks in Are ChatGPT dots worth it for a small team yet? $100/user/moBusiness Premium seat, billed yearly

Everyone's been posting about OpenAI's new dots, so I spent some time reading past the launch posts to see what a small team actually gets.

What it is

Dots are always-on agents inside ChatGPT, launched September 29. Each one gets its own cloud computer and browser, connects to thousands of apps, and keeps working on a goal between your conversations. You can message it in ChatGPT, Slack, or Teams.

The claim

The pitch is an assistant that notices things on its own. OpenAI's own example is a dot that spotted an unsent invoice, drafted it, and sent it after the owner approved.

What it actually does

The first dot comes with a Pro plan or a Business Premium seat, which runs 100 dollars a user per month billed annually, versus 20 for a standard Business seat. There's no public API, setup is desktop only, and as of launch nobody had published an independent test of how reliable it is. OpenAI says plainly that dots make mistakes and anything consequential should be reviewed.

Who it fits

An owner or ops lead with a pile of recurring follow-ups spread across a few apps is the right first user. A team that needs every action logged and repeatable is better off with a narrower, purpose-built automation for now.

Worth trying.

Put it on one seat, for one person and one recurring job, for a month before anyone else gets it. The idea is real, but two weeks after launch the track record isn't.

Oct132026Oct 13, 2026
Local service Replying to every missed call by hand Is automating missed-call replies worth it for a 10-person shop? 20-30 min/daytime + missed bookings

I spent a few hours this week on what a missed call actually costs a small shop. Here's what I found.

The task

Someone has to notice a missed call, look up the number, and text back a reply, especially after hours or in the middle of a busy stretch.

The real cost

For a shop missing even 5-6 calls a day, that's roughly 20-30 minutes of scattered, interruption-heavy work daily. The calls that never get a reply at all are often lost bookings, which costs more than the time does.

The fix

A basic business-line tool with missed-call text-back built in. Grasshopper's cheapest plan runs about $14 a month and sends an automatic text the moment a call is missed.

Automate it.

At $14 a month against calls that would otherwise go unanswered, this is one of the easier calls on the list. Turn it on and move on.

Oct112026Oct 11, 2026
Professional services Building the weekly status update from scratch Is a dedicated tool worth it for weekly client status updates? ~3 hrs/wkspread across the team

I looked into how professional-services teams handle weekly status updates this week, mostly out of curiosity about whether it's worth automating at all.

The task

Every week, someone writes up where a client's work stands, pulled together from memory and a handful of open files.

The real cost

For a 10-person team with a few people doing this, figure around 3 hours a week total. Real time, but spread thin across people rather than sitting in one place.

The fix

There isn't a clean, off-the-shelf tool built for this exact task. The practical fix is a shared template inside whatever practice-management or project tool the team already has, plus a recurring reminder, instead of a new subscription. A team that wanted this fully off their plate instead of just lighter could have a small custom tool built to pull the update straight from their existing project data. Full disclosure, that's the kind of thing Plainbuilt actually builds. For a team this size though, the free template covers most of the ground on its own.

Oct92026Oct 9, 2026
Professional services Following up on a signature, again Is it worth fixing how often someone has to chase a signature? ~35 min/wkspent chasing signatures

I looked into how professional-services teams chase signatures this week, curious whether the fix is really a new tool or something they already have.

The task

A document goes out for a signature, and someone has to remember to check back and nudge the client or counterparty when it sits unsigned.

The real cost

For a small firm sending out 10 to 15 documents a week for signature, figure 30 to 40 minutes total on manual follow-ups.

The fix

Dropbox Sign includes reminders and notifications on every plan, including the free tier, and its Essentials plan is 20 dollars a month flat for unlimited signature requests. If the firm already uses an e-signature tool, this is probably a setting to turn on rather than something new to buy.

Automate it.

This is about as close to free as these fixes get, especially if the reminder feature is already sitting unused in a tool you're paying for anyway.

Oct72026Oct 7, 2026
Local service Writing a new reply to every single review Does review management need its own paid tool for a small shop? ~25 min/mowriting replies

Figured I'd actually test whether review replies need a dedicated tool instead of just hearing people say they do.

The task

Every new review gets a reply typed out from scratch, even when most of them are thanking a customer or addressing the same handful of complaints.

The real cost

For a shop getting 10 to 15 reviews a month, figure 20 to 30 minutes total writing replies one at a time.

The fix

Full reputation-management platforms exist, but they're built for businesses juggling reviews across many locations, more than a single shop needs. A bank of 4 or 5 reply templates, tweaked for the specific review each time, covers almost all of it for free.

Oct52026Oct 5, 2026
Internal team Approvals that die in someone's inbox Does a stalled approval need a dedicated tool to fix? ~2 hrs/wklost to chasing

I've been meaning to look at how approvals get stuck in someone's inbox, so I finally did.

The task

Something needs a yes from a manager or partner, it lands in their inbox, and it sits there until someone remembers to follow up.

The real cost

For a team of 15 or so with a handful of approvals moving at any time, figure a couple of hours a week lost to chasing and re-explaining what's waiting on someone.

The fix

There's no single tool built for this exact problem. The practical fix is a shared tracker, even a simple spreadsheet or board, with a recurring reminder for anything sitting more than a day or two. A small custom tool that pings the right person automatically once something stalls is possible too, and it's the kind of thing Plainbuilt builds, but most teams this size don't need to spend on that yet.

Oct32026Oct 3, 2026
Professional services Typing up notes after every client call Is an AI note-taker worth it for a team that lives on calls? 5-8 hrs/wkspent on call notes

This week I dug into whether an AI note-taker is worth it for teams that spend half their day on calls.

The task

After a long call, someone has to go back through it, or their own scratch notes, and type up a clean summary for the file or for whoever wasn't there.

The real cost

For a team doing 10 to 15 calls a week with real notes after each one, figure 30 to 45 minutes a call. That's easily 5 to 8 hours a week spread across the team.

The fix

Fireflies.ai records and summarizes calls automatically, with paid plans starting at 10 dollars per user a month. For a team of 5, that's roughly 50 dollars a month against 5 to 8 hours of typing every week.

Automate it.

Even with some editing needed on the summaries it produces, the math favors turning this on. It's one of the cheaper calls on this list.

Oct12026Oct 1, 2026
Local service Letting leads go uncalled Is a CRM upgrade worth it just to catch leads nobody called back? 2-3 leads/wkgoing uncalled

Spent some time this week on how shops track leads that never get called back.

The task

A lead comes in, gets written down somewhere, and sometimes nobody circles back to call it. Nobody notices until the lead's gone cold or booked with someone else.

The real cost

For a shop pulling in 15 to 20 leads a week across a couple of reps, figure 2 to 3 slip through untouched most weeks. Even one of those turning into a job is worth more than the time anyone spends checking the list.

The fix

Jobber's Grow plan adds automated lead follow-ups and lead management, but it's priced at 349 dollars a month for teams, a real jump from the 39 dollar Core plan. Unless you need the rest of what Grow unlocks, paying for that tier just to catch a couple of missed leads doesn't pencil out. The cheaper fix is a shared list everyone checks once a day, or a calendar reminder tied to each new lead. A small custom alert that flags any lead untouched after 24 hours is doable too, and genuinely something Plainbuilt could build, but for a shop this size the daily check is cheaper and plenty good.

Want this done for your team? The assessment turns the work you repeat into a practical plan: what to simplify, what to automate, and where to start.

Get my assessment